基于方差区域民营经济发展平衡

我国的经济发展一直存在着区域经济发展不平衡的特点,由于革新开放国家优先发展东部地区的政策以及沿海位置的地理优势影响,东部地区经济水平明显领先于中部以及西部地区。随着民营经济的不断发展,已经成为国民经济以及地区经济发展的重要组成部分。然而,区域间经济水平的差距持续存在,有学者表明,东部、中部、西部地区经济发展的差距,主要来源于民营经济的发展水平的差距,即民营经济是影响地区发展的重要因素。本文认为,除了优先发展及地理优势的因素之外,经营环境是影响民营经济发展的关键因素。在确认了民营经济对于区域发展的重要地位及发展近况之后,文章在文献研究和定性研究的基础上,在诸多指标中选取了具有代表性的六个关键指标,构建影响东部、中部、西部地区民营经济发展水平差异的指标体系。运用SPSS统计软件对以地区为基准的六个指标进行单因素方差浅析浅析,得出导致中西部地区民营经济发展缓慢的关键因素,在检测设中推翻工业总产值占比的影响,肯定其它五项指标的影响。第一部分提出选题背景及意义,总结本文的研究策略、研究思路及研究框架;第二部分针对方差浅析浅析法及民营经济发展进行理论综述,为文章进行理论铺垫;第三部分从拉动经济增长、增加就业机会和培育市场三个方面阐述民营经济的重要地位及作用,并且从总体规模、税收负担、科技投入、融资环境、准入限制、产业结构角度浅析浅析中西部地区民营经济发展近况;第四部分根据文献研究选取具有代表性的指标,并进行可行性浅析浅析与实用性浅析浅析,构建指标体系,运用单因素方差浅析浅析法对东部、中部、西部三个地区的各项指标进行差异浅析浅析,得出影响三个地区民营经济发展的关键因素;第五部分从方差浅析浅析结果中得出结论,并提出相关对策与展望。文章最后得出,税收占比、科技投入占比、从业人员占比及旅游外汇收入是影响东部、中部、西部地区民营经济发展平衡的重要因素;固定资产投资占比对区域发展平衡有一定影响,但是并不显著;工业总产值占比对于三个地区的发展平衡没有影响。同时,影响民营经济发展的关键因素在地区间并不完全相同。

【Abstract】wWw.shuoshilunwen.com There has been a feature of regional economic development is uneven of China’s economic development. The economy of the eastern region was significantly ahead of the economy in central and western regions due to the national policy of development priorities and geographical advantage since Reform and opening up. With the continuous development of the private economy, it has become the important component of a national and regional economic development. However, the regional disparities among economic levels he been there, and some scholars said that the gap of economic development of the eastern, central and western regions, mainly come from the gap of the private economy development level, that is mean private economy is an important factor affect the development of region.This paper argues that, in addition to factors of development priority and the geographical advantage, the business environment is a key factor affecting development of private economy. After recognition of the important role of the private economy for regional development and development status, the article select six key indicators from number of indicators and make construction of indicator system which affect development level of regions private economic based on the literature studies and qualitative research. Doing ANOVA analysis of six indicators in regions by SPSS statistical software, result in the key factors which led to the slow development of private economy in central and western regions. As a result, overthrowing the assumption that the affect of the proportion of total industrial output value is Significant, and certain the other five indicators effects.The first part presents the research background and significance, summarizes the research methods, research ideas and research framework; The second part is theory and review of the ANOVA analysis and private economic development, which is the theoretical groundwork for the articles; The third part refers the private economy status and role in promoting economic growth, increasing employment opportunities and developing the market and selecting the key indicators, analyzing status of private economic in the central and western regions from view of the overall size, the tax burden, the R&D investment, the financing environment, the access restrictions, industry structure; The forth part select six key indicators from number of indicators and make construction of indicator system which affect development level of regions private economic based on the literature studies and qualitative research, and doing feasibility analysis and the practical analysis, and refer the single factor analysis of variance on the indicators of the eastern, central and western regions, come to the key factor of private economic development of three areas; The fifth part get the conclusion from the results of analysis of variance, and propose.Finally, the text drawing that tax accounting, R&D investment accounting, employees accounting and the touri foreign exchange income are the important factors affecting the development balance of private economy in the eastern, central and western regions; fixed asset investment accounted he an impact on development balance of regions, but not significant; industrial output value accounted he no effect on the development balance of the three regions. Meanwhile, the key factors are not identical among regions.

【关键词】 民营经济;区域差异;发展平衡;方差浅析浅析;指标;
【Key words】 Private economy;regional differences;the development of balance;analysis of variance;indicators;

相关论文

基于方差区域民营经济发展平衡

我国的经济发展一直存在着区域经济发展不平衡的特点,由于革新开放国家优先发展东部地区的政策以及沿海位置的地理优势影响,东部地区经济水平。
浏览量:94227 点赞量:20930

财政分权和区域经济不平衡发展效应

中国自20世纪80年代初开始进行财政分权革新,至今已30余年,财政体制经历了从由政府完全统收统支到向地方政府相对分权的深刻变革。由于地区间。
浏览量:156137 点赞量:33744

基于方差区域民营经济发展平衡

我国的经济发展一直存在着区域经济发展不平衡的特点,由于革新开放国家优先发展东部地区的政策以及沿海位置的地理优势影响,东部地区经济水平。
浏览量:15592 点赞量:4903

基于方差区域民营经济发展平衡

我国的经济发展一直存在着区域经济发展不平衡的特点,由于革新开放国家优先发展东部地区的政策以及沿海位置的地理优势影响,东部地区经济水平。
浏览量:13324 点赞量:4461

四川省区域经济不平衡发展

区域经济发展的时空不平衡性是一种普遍存在的现象,对这一不足的关注和研究,推动了区域经济学的产生和发展。在现阶段和今后一个相当长的时。
浏览量:19448 点赞量:5513