从国际贸易角度看碳关税对我国经济影响

美国2007年由次级贷款引发的金融危机在2008年向全世界迅速扩散,被世人称之为“金融海啸”。这次金融危机给各国的经济都带来了不同程度的创伤,美国自己也未能幸免。基于此,美国于2009年6月26日通过一项对进口产品征收“边界调节税”的法案,这是美国首次就制约温室气体排放所进行的立法,法案提出,美国政府将从2020年起对进口的高能耗产品征收碳关税,主要是针对那些包括中国在内的没有实施减排限额的国家。此方案的提出立刻引起了国际社会的不同声音,对碳关税的反对声音亦不绝于耳。美国声称征收碳关税的主要目的是为了保护日益恶劣的环境以及维持公平竞争,但其真正动因受到了诸多发展中国家的质疑。以中国、印度为首的发展中国家在第一时间对碳关税提出了反对,认为碳关税是“披着华丽外衣的贸易保护主义”,是发达国家为了保护国内产业、遏制发展中大国崛起而设立的新型贸易壁垒,世界各国应对此种影响自由贸易的行为采取抵制态度。而与此同时,以法国为首的部分发达国家对美国征收碳关税报以支持的态度,认为碳关税不仅可以有效地避开发达国家产品由于节能减排而遭受的不公平竞争,也有利于世界经济的可持续发展。碳关税作为一种新型的国际贸易壁垒,具有诸多不同于传统贸易壁垒的特性,例如,其合法与否的不确定性、名义上的合理性与实际的不公平性。也正是由于碳关税的特殊性,使其在实施后对不同国家的经济主体会产生不同的影响:对于征收碳关税的发达国家而言,碳关税在短期内有效地保护了其本国工业,推动了金融危机后经济的复苏,并抑制了发展中大国经济的发展;而对于被征收碳关税的发展中国家而言,碳关税无疑是对经济贸易发展的严重打击。发展中国家目前正处于工业发展的中期阶段,主要依靠工业带动经济发展,工业制成品仍然是国家出口贸易的主体,而受到资金与技术的限制,发展中国家的节能减排能力有限,碳关税必定给其带来难以负担的压力。至今为日,世界贸易组织并没有明确地为碳关税定性,其合法性仍然是各国争论的焦点,而不可否认的是,碳关税的征收对于像中国这样的发展中国家来讲是非常不公平的。从经济上讲,碳关税起到了保护国内产业,推动经济复苏的作用;政治上,碳关税也将成为各国争夺国际话语权的手段之一。随着低碳经济的发展,关于气候环境的国际谈判此起彼伏,发达国家急于在新一轮的经济发展中抢占制高点,碳关税让他们在推卸环境污染责任的同时,带上了贸易保护先锋的光环,可以说碳关税是发达国家精心策划后的产物。本文从介绍碳关税的含义和发展入手,如果某一国生产的产品,主要是高耗能的产品,不能达到进口国在节能和减排方面设定的标准,那么该产品就被征收特别的二氧化碳排放关税;碳税是根据化石燃料燃烧后排放碳量的多少,针对化石燃料的生产、分配或使用来征收税费的。可以说,碳关税是碳税作为国际税的一种表现形式。为了使读者进一步了解碳关税的实质,文相似度检测绍了碳关税产生的背景和发展历程,为碳关税实质浅析浅析做下铺垫。碳关税是在金融危机,能源危机,全球变暖三大背景下应运而生的,这使得碳关税的提出远不止应对气候变化简单。为了更深层次探讨,文中列出了美国、法国、印度和中国政府对于碳关税截然不同的态度,反映出碳关税背后各国在政治、经济利益上的争夺。低碳经济是世界可持续发展的必经之路,碳关税虽然还未实施,但不可排除其实施的可能性。因此,本文进一步浅析浅析了碳关税对世界以及对我国经济与贸易的影响。碳关税的实施从环境保护的角度看具有一定的积极影响,但是,经过政治包装的碳关税已经不仅是一项环境保护政策,而逐渐演变为各国政治场上的博弈。中国是发展中大国,以煤炭为主要能耗资源,是发达国家工业制成品的主要供给国之一,也无疑成为碳关税实施后的主要受害国。从产业结构来讲,我国经济发展仍然主要依靠第二产业带动,而碳关税的实施必定会阻碍第二产业的发展,进而影响整个国家的经济发展;从出口贸易来讲,至2008年,我国工业制成品出口已经占我国出口总额的近95%,碳关税的实施将导致我国高能耗的工业制成品出口大幅缩减,给我国出口贸易造成严重打击;从我国贸易政策来讲,如何制定相应的税收政策应对碳关税的来袭,以及如何防止其他国家的高耗能产品流入我国是政府急需深思的不足。但是,不可否认的是,从长远角度看,碳关税的征收也可以在一定程度上保护日益恶劣的环境与推动发展中国家产业结构升级,是具有一定积极意义的。最后,结合中国现实以及借鉴其他国家的经验,本文从政府和企业两个角度提出面对碳关税我国所应采取的应对措施。中国政府应通过制定政策、实施鼓励措施等来推动国内新能源建设,坚持发展低碳经济。同时,中国应与其他发展中国家结成“反碳关税联盟”,为本国争取的国际话语权与经济利益。作为微观主体的各大企业,应通过走出去战略,积极学习国外节能减排技术,通过吸收与创新,实现企业自身的低碳化发展。为了减少个别国家实施碳关税后对我国经济贸易所造成的损失,企业应积极开拓不同的海外市场实现市场的多硕士论文网化发展,并通过参与碳交易,发展CDM项目从发达国家获得资金和技术支持,推动企业可持续发展。

【Abstract】wWw.shuoshilunwen.com The subprime lending of America in 2007 resulted in the financial crisis, which has spread fast around the world. The economy of each country was badly wounded, so was the United States. Meantime, against the global warming, energy crisis, in 2009, the United States issued the American Clean Energy and Security Act which said that the United States government will impose carbon tariffs on importing high energy consumption products since 2020, and the target countries include those who do not take measures to limit carbon emission. This is the first time that the United States government laid down a law on controlling the carbon emission. The proposal of the Act incurred hot discussion in the world. It is said by the United States that the main purpose of carbon tariffs is to protect the deteriorating environment and maintain the fair competition. However, many developing countries questioned the real aim and disagreed with the United States.Developing countries such as China and India strongly fight against the Act of imposing carbon tariffs, thinking that carbon tariffs is actually the trade protectioni and a new trade barrier to protect their domestic industries and curb the development of developing countries, so the world should take resistance against carbon tariffs which will definitely undermine the free trade. While developed countries like France took a positive attitude toward carbon tariffs, holding the opinion that carbon tariffs could help the products from developed countries oid from unfair competition for the reason of energy sing and carbon reduction, also, carbon tariffs will benefits the sustainable development of the world economy.Carbon tariffs, as a new form of international trade barrier, has many features different from traditional trade barriers, for instance, the uncertainty of its legitimacy, the nominal rationality and the actual unfairness. It is the peculiarity of carbon tariffs that will definite result in different influence on each economic subject. To developed countries that impose carbon tariffs, they will effectively protect their industries, promote their recovery from financial crisis and inhibit developing countries from economic development. To developing countries, carbon tariffs will be a hey hit to their economy, for developing countries are in the middle phase of industrial development, heily relying on industries to drive their economy with industrial manufactured goods the mainstay of their exports. However, developing countries he limited ability in energy-sing and emission-reduction for lack of capital and technology, therefore, carbon tariffs will bring unbearable pressure for them.Up till now, World Trade Organization has not determined the nature of carbon tariffs, the legitimacy of which was obscure. However, it is said that the imposing of carbon tariffs is not fair to developing countries like China and India.In the perspective of economy, carbon tariffs serve to protect domestic industries and facilitate economic recovery; in the view of politics, carbon tariffs will help strengthen their influence in the world. With the popularity of low-carbon economy, many international negotiations on climate change he been held; developed countries are in such a hurry to find out a new vantage point in economic development. Carbon tariffs is the very thing which can help developed countries shake off their guilty of pollution, while bring the good reputation of environmental protection. It can be said that carbon tariffs is the product of developed countries after careful planning.The paper starts from the definition and history of carbon tariffs, with the targets of Carbon tariffs carbon-intensive products such as aluminum, steel, cement, glass products and other chemical commodity. Carbon tax is levied on carbon emissions, to be exact, a pollution tax. It is based on the carbon emission amount after combustion of fossil fuels, the producing, the distribution and the use of fossil fuels to levy taxes. It can be said that carbon tariffs are an international tax of carbon tax. In order for a further understanding of carbon tariffs, the paper elaborates on the development of carbon tariffs. Carbon tariffs is the product against the background of financial crisis, energy crisis and global warming, and this makes the proposal of carbon tariffs more complicated. More still, different attitudes toward to carbon tariffs by countries like the United States, France, India and China reflect the competition on economic and political strength.Low carbon economy is the only way for sustainable development. Though carbon tariffs has not been implemented, we he to take the possibility of implementation into consideration. China is a large developing country; with coal its main energy resource. China is one of the important suppliers of industrial manufactured goods to developed countries, and once carbon tariffs is imposed, China will become a main victim. In terms of industrial structure, the secondary industry is the main source to drive the economic development. However, carbon tariffs will affect bad influence on the development of the secondary industry; in terms of export, the export of industrial manufactured goods was 95% of the whole export amount in 2008. Obviously, carbon tariffs will be a hey blow to China’s export; in terms of trade policy, Chinese government need to find urgent solutions to problems brought by carbon tariffs, for example, make adjustment of tax policy, how to prevent high energy consumption products from other countries to China. Whatever, we he to admit that, in the long run, carbon tariffs will play a positive role in protecting the deteriorating environment and promoting the optimization of industrial structure in developing countries.In the last part of the paper, the author suggests several measures for the government and enterprises on the basis of the current situation of China. China should brely fight against the carbon tariffs proposal; what’s more, positive measures should also be taken to response to it. Through policy and encouraging measures, Chinese government should facilitate the construction of new energy, and develop the low carbon economy. Meantime, China needs to establish "anti-carbon tariffs Union" with other developing countries so as to strive for more verbal and economic rights. Chinese enterprises should implement the "going out" strategy and learn, absorb and make adjustment of foreign advanced technology of energy sing and emission reduction. In order to reduce the damage from carbon tariffs imposed by some countries, enterprises are supposed to make diversified developing strategy in different foreign markets. With carbon trading and CDM project, enterprises should make efforts to gain financial and technological support from developed countries. These measures could help companies develop in a sustainable way.

【关键词】 碳关税;反碳关税;清洁发展机制;
【Key words】 Carbon Tariffs;Anti-Carbon Tariffs;CDM;

相关论文

国贸碳关税对我国出口贸易影响与对策探究

【硕士论文】:2009年6月,在美国爆发次级债危机、全球气候环境持续的背景下,美国众议院了《美国清洁能源与安全法案》,将从2020年开始对在内。
浏览量:9771 点赞量:4292

国际贸易法视野下“碳关税”

虽然气候变化已经成为国际社会的共同关切,但是发达国家和发展中国家在减排责任的承担上仍然存在较大分歧,导致双方至今没有达成具有强制约束。
浏览量:15959 点赞量:4902

论碳关税对我国出口贸易影响-

摘要:碳关税是现今国际贸易领域最受人关注的焦点之一,其内涵是以进口产品生产历程中的碳排放量为征收依据的排放费。碳关税的滥觞可以追溯。
浏览量:119313 点赞量:25921

国际贸易法视野下“碳关税”

虽然气候变化已经成为国际社会的共同关切,但是发达国家和发展中国家在减排责任的承担上仍然存在较大分歧,导致双方至今没有达成具有强制约束。
浏览量:94410 点赞量:20841

以国际贸易角度看碳关税对我国经济影响

论文摘要:摘要:在全球生态环境不断遭受破坏的今天,进展低碳经济是世界走可持续进展的必经之路。以环境保护的角度看征收碳关税措施则具有。
浏览量:121738 点赞量:26950

立法试以国际贸易角度来我国反垄断立法

摘要:我国反垄断法的出台为限制跨国企业的垄断行为提供了法律依据,为我国市场经济的有序发展提供了保障。本文就从国际经济贸易的角度来探。
浏览量:21147 点赞量:6511

碳关税征收对中国影响与对策

摘 要:近年来,一些国家打着低碳减排的旗号单方面主张对高耗能产品征收碳关税,引起了国际范围内广泛的关注。碳关税的征收必定带来企业成。
浏览量:94971 点赞量:20974