早期儒家政治哲学

中国近代政治哲学的一个重要的命题就是政治能否成立的不足。作为中国漫长的政治历程的基础价值理论和影响最为深远的哲学思想,儒家哲学与思想能否取得一致性,就成为近现代儒家学者所要完成的重要理论建设使命,而影响较为广泛的新儒家则在这一方面进行了积极的尝试和努力。依照不同标准,政权可以划分为不同的形式,大体上可以包括君主制、贵族制与共和制。中国虽未产生出的政权形式,然而就早期儒家政治哲学中的相关理论来考察,当时的政权形式,充其量只能说它属于贵族制,绝不能将其简单地等同于君主专制的形式。论文的第一章,主要是从政权的本质这个角度来探讨的,考察早期儒家对这一不足的相关论述,以揭示早期儒家政治哲学的这样一个特点,即它将政权的公共性和私有性以理想和现实相结合的方式统一于自身。探讨儒家的政治哲学,就要围绕着政权的相关不足来进行论述,首先要解决的是政权的本质不足。政权,特别是国家政权,在本质上是一种公共权力,而掌握政权的机构也是公共权力机构。这一点,可以从政权的产生过程得到证实:最初的政权是由部落联盟逐渐演化形成的,部落之间是通过共同选举和禅让的方式实现权力转移的。然而,“家天下”格局的出现转变了国家权力的公共性,使之变成了一家一姓垄断的东西,被赋予了某种私有的属性。这显然违背了政权的本质。但这种本质却仍然会在政治实际操作中体现出来。围绕着这一公共权力的不足,政权形式依据不同的标准被划分成了不同的种类,也就是说,先秦时期的政权形式并不能被简单地归结为专制政权,这从早期儒家对这一不足的阐述上可以看到。儒家将政权的来源归为“天予”,是天将国家政权交付于某一位有德的圣王,这就是人们通常所说的君权神授。在天下成为一家之天下的情况下,世袭成为政权的传承方式,这显然破坏了政权的公共属性,极容易走向暴政。儒家对此不足有自己的解决方式:一方面,在承认“家天下”的现实基础上,保持“天下为公”的理想追求,对当权者的统治提出诸多原则性的规定,以缓和社会矛盾;另一方面,又强调革命的合法性,在统治者无道的情况下,人民有权起来革命,推翻暴政。此外,早期儒家关于政权的本质的相关理论,还包括,儒家在“家国同构”的理论前提下,推崇型政治,这显然是结合着儒家学说对“家天下”现实的认识而来的,其目的是要通过弘扬最基本的人伦道德来规范社会秩序,从而保证政治的稳定性。对早期儒家的政治哲学,我们应该予以客观的认识和评价。首先,儒家肯定了君的地位和作用,然而对君的要求是要做圣君,这是对君的道德要求,从而为其权力的实施提供一个标准;其次,在儒家的论述中,公的理想与私的现实在实践中相互兼容了,儒家提出了“天下为公”的政治图景,无疑,这也是一种政治要求;最后,“家国同构”的政权理论,虽然有其时代意义,然而在其后历史发展中演变成了与其对立的制约性因素。在揭示了政权的本质不足之后,接着就要来探讨政权来源及存在的合法性不足。论文第二章主要是梳理与浅析浅析早期儒家关于政权合法性不足的相关理论,进而指出早期儒家政治哲学中包含了对民意的充分认同,虽然其政权合法性并不完整,然而却不能说它将其完全忽略了。一个政权的取得与建立,首先要保证其自身来源的合法性。早期儒家对这一不足的探讨已较为全面。在儒家政治哲学中,包含了政权合法性的三个硕士论文网素:天道、民意与历史。其中,“天予”和民意的向背,是政权合法性的现实基础。然而在现实中,天道与历史文化的合法性往往被君独占,在具体的政治实践操作过程中,政权的合法性往往变得不完整,即“君有”挤兑了“民有”,独占了“天有”,从而有导向专制的趋势。政权的转移方式包括世袭、禅让、革命等,这是靠力与德的方式实行政权转移,而缺乏选举的方式。此外,早期儒家对政权合法性的流失不足也做了论述,为以革命的方式来取得政权的合法性作出了论证。论文第三章对先秦时期所存在的政权形式进行了浅析浅析,并结合西方对政权形式的划分,指出当时的政权形式是君主制。在大变革的时代,君主制也随着时代的变化而变化,各家各派都提出了如何改造和规范君主制的主张,道家推崇“帝道”模式,儒家推崇“王道”或“仁政”模式,墨家提出了“义政”模式,法家提出了“霸道”模式。这几种政权模式都对后世产生了深远的影响,应当给予客观的评价。周代所实行的政权体制结构及早期儒家所推崇的政治模式,是建立在其对政权公共性和合法性的继承的基础上的。早期儒家的政治哲学思想中,体现出了由民意所引发的民本思想、天道所引发出的德治圣王思想以及大一统思想,这些都是十分具有参考价值的。早期儒家致力于建设一种道德义务型社会,它所依靠的主体分别是宗族和士阶层,所依赖的原则是“中和”思想,这与体制有着根本的不同。也就因此,儒家理想的政治实践模式就体现为“天下为公”,它可以强化君子与小人的差别,突出教化思想的作用。基于这一基础,可以得出结论:早期儒家推崇的是“王制”思想。周代政权充其量也就是君主制,绝不是专制。论文第四章主要讨论的是早期儒家政权理论的合理性因素及其对现代政权的意义。早期儒家关于政权的理论有着自身合理性的因素,并对现代政权建设有着积极的意义。其本身思想内容的理想性与现实性的统一为政权的存在提供了依据,而对政权合法性的规定使政权的运行更加合理化。此外,它所提倡的政权的目标就是构建一个和谐的、稳定的社会。在政治革新的同时,结合早期儒家政治哲学中的有益部分,可以使现代政权理论更加合理,使政权的具体运行更加和谐,同时也能避开现代所带来的一些弊端和不稳定性因素。

【Abstract】wWw.shuoshilunwen.com An important proposition of the modern Chinese political philosophy is the question whether democracy was established.As China’s long political courses of value theory and the most far-reaching philosophy, whether Confucian philosophy and democratic ideas can get consistency , will become an important mission of modern Confucian scholars to complete the construction of the theory. And the new Confuciani who he a wide range of affects do the positive try and effort in this aspect. According to different criteria, regime can be divided into different forms, generally can include feudal society, monarch autocracy and a republic. China is still not produced a democratic regime. However, early form of Confucian political philosophy and relevant theories of the regime to inspect, and then, at best we can only form of said it belongs to the feudal barons system, is enlightened monarchy, but you can never be equal to its simply despoti of the form.The paper’s first chapter, mainly from the Angle of regime’s essence to discuss, investigating on this issue of early Confuciani to reveal the relevant expositions of political philosophy of early Confuciani such a characteristic that it will regime in public and sketched the ideal and the reality with way to united in itself. Confucian political philosophy, discussed the related to revolve around the regime is discussed, and problems to be solved and we first nature of the problem is the political power. Regime, especially state power, and in essence is a kind of public power, and grasp the political power the institutions of public authority also. This, can produce process from regime confirmed: initial regime is gradually formed by tribal alliance between the, the tribe is through common elections and ShanRang way realization regime power traner. However, "the emergence of GuTianXia" pattern changed the regime, which the public power became a furniture some property, which clearly violated the regime’s essence. But this essence but will still be here for political practice reflected.Around this public power problems, according to different standard , form of regime had been divided into different types, the pre-qin period form and the regime cannot be simply boils down to tyranny, this from early Confuciani paper to this question can be found on the. The source of Confucian will regime to return for "days with multiple attribute," is the son of the days give days. However, the world become bereed highway is a hereditary become regime under the whole heen, and inheriting way, this apparently destroyed regime characteristics, extremely easy to tyranny. This problem he their own Confucian solution: on the one hand, in the reality of GuTianXia acknowledged that "based on" strategic "world, keep the ideals, and the management of the authorities put forward many provisions, appease conflict; On the other hand, also emphasizes the legitimacy of the revolution. In addition, early Confuciani the essence of about regime included the related theory of Confucian "home countries in the theoretical premise isomorphi" ethic, praise highly political, it’s obviously in combination with Confuciani GuTianXia "reality of" to the understanding, the purpose is obviously to get through promoting the most basic ethic morality to regulate social order, thereby ensuring political stability.On the early Confuciani, we should be objective understanding of the recognition and evaluation. First, the Confucian affirmed Jun’s status and the function, but the requirement to Jun is to be holy gentleman, this is the moral requirement to the king, and the implementation of its power to provide a standard; Secondly, the article expounds in Confuciani, male ideals and private reality in practice, Confucian compatible forward "world for" the political landscape, no doubt, this is also a kind of political requirements; Finally, the "home countries isomorphi", despite its regime theory in the subsequent time significance, but its opposite evolved into the history of the restrictive factors.After the nature of the regime is revealed to explore, we must explore the source and the legality of the existence of regime. The second chapter is basically combing and analysising about early Confuciani legitimacy related theory of power, then points out that the political philosophy early Confuciani contains the full identity to public opinion, although the regime legitimacy is not complete, but cannot say that it will its completely overlooked. The acquisition and establish a regime, the first to ensure its own source of legitimacy. On this issue early Confuciani already comprehensively discussed. In the Confucian political philosophy, points out the regime in the legitimacy of three elements: heen, the public opinion and history. Among them, "day to" and public opinion, it is the legitimacy of England-but regime basis in reality. Yet in reality, the legality of heen and the historical culture is usually Jun monopoly, in specific political practice operation process, the regime’s legitimacy tend to become incomplete, namely "gentleman he" runs, "the" people "days has" exclusive, thus to autocratic regimes. The only way to produce power almost ShanRang, revolution, including hereditary, that is the way with Germany by force, and lack of bottom-up exclusive TianDao of thought. Produced regime In addition, the Confucian political philosophy to the legitimacy of erosion problems also regime described, as the revolution to overthrow tyranny the legitimacy of the regime acquisition modes made demonstration.Papers of the pre-Qin period the third chapter will existing regime form, and combining the analysis for the division of western, and points out that the regime form the regime at form is positive significance to the monarchy. From the perspective of history, the regime’s form, can be divided into Taoist highly "emperor way", the Confucian thoughts, the thoughts of "benevolent YiZheng" and "reserve" thought and legali "bossy" thought, all these claims to later generations he had a profound impact, shall give an objective evaluation.Zhou dynasty practiced a regime system structure and early Confuciani highly political pattern, is established on the public and legitimacy of regime based on the inheritance. The political philosophy of early Confuciani embodies ideas, triggered by public opinion the people-oriented thoughts, out of heen triggered by king thought and morality counterwork holy, these are very thoughts has reference value. Early Confuciani moral obligation to build a type society, it is the subject of depends respectively and the class, their reliance on principle is "neutral" with democracy thought, this is a crucial difference. Will therefore, Confucian ideal political practice mode is embodied in the "world people", it can strengthen the gentleman and a mean differences, highlight the role of enlightenment ideas. Based on this basis, we can draw the conclusion: the early Confucian political philosophy is "highly WangZhi theory of" thought. The pre-Qin society’s regime is at best, never was absolute monarchy.The chapter 4 is mainly discussed the theory of early Confucian regime for rational factors and the significance of modern regime. The theory about early Confuciani regime has its rationality of factors, and the construction of modern regime has a positive meaning. Its ideological content and practicality of the ideal nature for the existence of unified power provides basis for regime, and the provisions of the legality of regime run more reasonable. In addition, it sounds regime goal is to construct a harmonious society. Democratic political reform in the meanwhile, combined with the Confucian political philosophy early part, can make good modern regime theory more reasonable, make regime the specific operation more harmonious, also oid the modern democracy brings some drawbacks and unstable factors.

【关键词】 早期儒家;政治哲学;政权本质;政权合法性;政权形式;
【Key words】 early Confucian;political philosophy;the essence of regime;the legitimacy of regime;regime forms;

相关论文

早期儒家政治哲学

中国近代政治哲学的一个重要的命题就是政治能否成立的不足。作为中国漫长的政治历程的基础价值理论和影响最为深远的哲学思想,儒家哲学与思。
浏览量:8288 点赞量:2749

早期儒家政治哲学

中国近代政治哲学的一个重要的命题就是政治能否成立的不足。作为中国漫长的政治历程的基础价值理论和影响最为深远的哲学思想,儒家哲学与思。
浏览量:11586 点赞量:3413

儒家新民新民:儒家政治哲学主题

摘要:“新民”概念原出自《大学》:“大学之道,在明明德,在亲民,在止于至善。”对于这一“亲民”,朱熹与王阳明却有不同的解释;对于修。
浏览量:155874 点赞量:33544

试述儒家论先秦儒家政治哲学思想

摘要:孔、孟、荀代表的先秦儒家,力倡修身为政、民为邦本、选贤使能、富民强国、礼主刑辅等方面为主要内容的政治哲学思想。自汉武帝以后,。
浏览量:70712 点赞量:16222