谈《史记》对《左传》中人物形象重塑

本文共分为五个部分。第一部分为绪论。介绍本文的研究对象、研究近况、研究角度和研究意义。第二部分是《史记》与《左传》春秋时期人物形象的比较。本文从以克己复礼为内涵的君子形象、以建功立业为内涵的贤能者形象和以隐忍发愤为内涵的烈丈夫形象这三种类别来比较《左传》与《史记》人物记载的差异,认为《史记》对《左传》中的人物形象有所继承,也有所改造,它剔除了《左传》中人物形象不合时宜的“礼”的成分,突出了积极有为的人物形象。第三部分是司马迁重塑《左传》人物形象的两个理由。一是礼在历史发展过程中的扬弃。春秋时期,礼有“仪之礼”和“德之礼”双重涵义。《左传》既重视仪之礼,也重视德之礼。而西汉初期的统治者主要奉崇黄老之术,不重视儒生和礼制,武力仍是得天下和守天下的主要手段,而且由于年代久远和长期战火,礼制自身已残缺模糊。这些时代因素深深影响了司马迁的价值观,使他能够一分为二地看待周代礼制,有所取有所不取。二是司马迁“成一家之言”的创作动机。《左传》塑造人物形象是为了彰示历史人物的善恶,因此以“礼”为尺度作为衡量人物的标准。司马迁整编《左传》素材并不是为了单纯地重述旧史,而是力图借助对历史众生的解读来“究天人之际,通古今之变,成一家之言”。这种推古论今的创作思想既注入了司马迁对人自身生命意义的反思,也注入了他对政权统治的反思。在人生方面,司马迁认为存活的价值在于“立名”,为此,人需要有隐忍发愤的意志;在政治方面,司马迁注重最高统治者的素质修养,提倡礼让,能够知人用人。第四部分是对司马迁重塑《左传》人物形象的平议。第一节认为司马迁虽然自觉修史,然《史记》的春秋部分意不在于保存《左传》史料。在取舍《左传》素材过程中,它舍弃了大量小诸侯国的资料,从而也舍弃了许多较为典型的历史人物。第二节认为司马迁的反思是未完成的人生深思,包括克己修身与悲剧命运的困惑,守礼君子与有为之士的行为矛盾和谦让高洁的政治理念的窘境。第三节认为司马迁对《左传》人物形象的重塑是时代转变下的巨大进步,他建立了全新的人生价值模式,提出“俶傥非常”这一独特的人生观,不以成败论英雄,敢于突破世俗礼法的观念。第五部分是结语。简要总结以上的论述。

【Abstract】wWw.shuoshilunwen.com This thesis can be divided into five parts.The first part is the introduction. It serves to introduce the object, status quo, angle, and meaning of the study.The second part is about the comparison between the historical characters of Zuo Zhuan and Shi Ji in the Spring and Autumn period. The article compares the differences between the historical figures of Zuo Zhuan and Shi Ji in the Spring and Autumn period through the connotative nobleman image of controlling oneself and observing polite ways; the connotative sage image of making contributions and start one’s career and the connotative force of character of bearing and working energetically. The figures of Shi Ji are inheritance and modification from the figures of Zuo Zhuan. Shi Ji eliminates the unreasonable part on etiquette (Li) in Zuo Zhuan, emphasizing the positive and enterprising character images.The third part is about the two main reasons for Szuma Chien’s remodling of the charactesr image. The first reason is that“etiquete”was developed the useful and discarded the useless during the process of historical development. In Spring and Autumn period, the word“etiquete”contains two meanings, namely, the ceremony of etiquette and the virtue of etiquette. Zuo Zhuan attaches importance to the ceremony of etiquetteas well as the virtue of etiquette. However, in the beginning of Western Han Dynasty, the ruler advocated the thoughts of Yellow Emperor and Lao Tzu, paying no attention to the Confucian scholar and etiquette system. The military force was the main means of getting and keeping the world. What’s more, because of the long history and long-term war, the etiquette system itself was incompletely vague. These factors of time deeply affected Szuma Chien’s sense of value so that he can look on the etiquette system in Zhou Dynasty cut in two and accepting or rejecting things after reflection. The second reason is his creative motivation of creating a philosophy of his own. The shaping of character image in Zuo Zhuan is to show the good and evil of historical human, as a result, it regards the“etiquete”as yardstick. Szuma Chien did not merely want to restate the past history when he reorganized the materials of Zuo Zhuan. He intended to unscramble people in the history to study the relation among nature, human and things seeing through the regularity for change of the ebb and flow of empires through the ages, forming his own notion. Studying the old time and talking about the new time is a kind of ideas guiding creation reflecting on the meaning of human himself and the regime. In life, Szuma Chien thinks that the value of survival is to gain reputation. And to achieve the goal, people should bear patiently and work energetically. In political aspect, Szuma Chien pays much attention to the self-cultivation of the top ruler’s quality, advocating courtliness and ability to know people and make use of people.The forth part is about the appraisal of the Szuma Chien’s remodling of the historical characters in Zuo Zhuan. The first chapter considers that although Shi Ji thinks that it recorded and summarized the history. The parts of Chun-Chiu do not intend to keep the historical materials of Zuo Zhuan but to abandon lots of somewhat typical historical persons during the process of accepting or rejecting the materials of Zuo Zhuan, abandoning a great deal of materials about some kingdoms. The second part considers that the reflection of Szuma Chien’s unfinished thought about life, which includes the confusion between self-controlling ,cultivating himself and tragic destiny, the contradiction between abiding courtesy and positive behior, and the quandary with a modest political ideal. The third parts consider that it is great progress of remolding Zuo Zhuan character’s in the time of change by Szuma chien. Szuma Chien has built an entirely new model of the value of life, putting forward the unique philosophy of not bothering about trifles and being magnificent person, not judging a hero by victory or defeat and daring to break with the notion of secular etiquette and laws.The fifth part is a conclusion which concludes the above statement.

【关键词】 史记;左传;人物形象;重塑;
【Key words】 Shi Ji;Zuo Zhuan;character;remodling;

相关论文

《左传》人文精神对《史记》创作影响

《左传》与《史记》是我国古代两部史学巨著,本文着重从人文精神方面,浅析浅析《史记》在创作过程中对《左传》的继承和发展。人文精神虽是。
浏览量:45784 点赞量:11419

《史记》“太史公曰”形成

论文摘要摘要:《史记》史论“太史公曰”的形成,是多种文化因子与司马迁个人特质碰撞与交融的结果。笔者认为,史论“太史公曰”的形成理由。
浏览量:33170 点赞量:8288

对于《史记》语言艺术

摘 要:《史记》是一部著名的历史著作,但也有着强烈的艺术性。本文从语言为切入点,分析其语言艺术。《史记》的语言具有明显的气势,充盈。
浏览量:32268 点赞量:7874

楚简《容成氏》和《史记》所记古史比较

本文利用出土文献《容成氏》与《史记》古史部分进行比较研究,目的是为了揭示战国史学向两汉史学发展的过程与变化。比较分三个层次,第一为具。
浏览量:20063 点赞量:6297

《史记》和复古派盟主王世贞

明代“《史记》学”在与心学思潮和资本主义萌芽等时代因素结合下,以特有的方式走入文人们的视野中。明人从史评、小说等文体方面开启了研究。
浏览量:132017 点赞量:28510

简述史记士人《史记》人物临终遗言设计

摘要:《史记》是中国史学史上的一座伟大丰碑,是司马迁呕心沥血的不朽著作,贯穿着司马迁的思想价值观念,浸染着司马迁的生命情绪。《史记》。
浏览量:71585 点赞量:16731